Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for July 23, 2024

  1. Ding a ling
    BasilBruce  4 months ago

    There was a Martin & Lewis bit on TV once where Dean told Jerry that all the members of Congress were basically working for them, and Jerry said into the camera, “All you guys in Congress, come over to my house Saturday and wash my car!”

     •  Reply
  2. Gentbear3b1a
    Gent  4 months ago

    If you feels that way then you should votes for a change, Rat.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    zekepotato  4 months ago

    And yet Fauci is the highest paid federal employee.

     •  Reply
  4. Calvins
    Algolei I  4 months ago

    Wait, only half??

     •  Reply
  5. Tumble
    Keno21  4 months ago

    Best government money can buy…

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    wbhern  4 months ago

    It’s the ones who aren’t millionaires yet that are the most worrisome. (And the ones who only became millionaires once they reached Washington…)

     •  Reply
  7. Large 1699141985732
    shanen0  4 months ago

    Really? I find that hard to believe unless it’s ignoring the debts. Especially the unpaid balance on the mortgages. Sure, the house may be worth a million, but I’d be shocked to found out that 5% of the mortgages have been paid off.

    This is one where the comic should have included a source citation for the joke? Also it’s distorting the distribution. The congress-critters are not at the low end of “millionaire”. I don’t remember if these comments can include URLs, so I’ll just say you can search of “wealth inequality in the United States” to learn more.

     •  Reply
  8. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  4 months ago

    In fairness, the percentage of Congress people who are rich has always been close to that. It was created by the 1% after all.

     •  Reply
  9. Purplepeopleeater small
    Purple People Eater  4 months ago

    I get the point, but it’s not really a fair comparison. Congressmen aren’t a cross section of society. If they were, you could expect over 11% of them to be living under the poverty level, and you could expect one of them (0.2%) to be homeless.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    Hidden-in-the-Trees Premium Member 4 months ago

    Good Grief…Leave the politics for another site for just once.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    juicebruce  4 months ago

    A Republic if you can keep it …

     •  Reply
  12. Img 4741
    Ninette  4 months ago

    A million isn’t that much anymore.

     •  Reply
  13. Screen shot 2020 05 01 at 9.09.59 am
    Acworthless  4 months ago

    And many of them became millionaires after being elected to Congress.

     •  Reply
  14. Sjacket
    phredturner  4 months ago

    Duh

     •  Reply
  15. Me4
    Hoosier Guy  4 months ago

    “Quasimodo predicted all this.” — Bobby Baccalieri, model train aficionado

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    MichiganMitten  4 months ago

    Ask yourself how they make that money after being elected.

     •  Reply
  17. Sevasleeping
    Serial Pedant  4 months ago

    They came for my neighbor, and I said nothing. Then…

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    donlackie  4 months ago

    Laws, particularly taxes laws, are written by the rich, for the rich. That is why we do not have a flat tax

     •  Reply
  19. Note
    Slowly, he turned...  4 months ago

    It has been this way for a long time…

     •  Reply
  20. 0804242
    James Wolfenstein  4 months ago

    The royal court stole the country from the king. Maybe, technically, they weren’t all part of the royal court. Let’s say nobility. The colonial system is still in place, now you have the right to pick a king from the pool of royal jesters :D

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    Gen.Flashman  4 months ago

    Surprised it is as low as 5%, especially if millionaire=having a net worth of one million since in many locations having a house worth one million is not uncommon. “The most recent data from the Fed’s Survey of Consumer Finances comes from the end of 2022. If you wanted to be in the top 5% of households at that point, you would need a net worth of $3,795,000.”

     •  Reply
  22. Fp
    GumbyDammit223  4 months ago

    Mmmhmmm…..Goverment BY the people FOR the people. Has anybody heard that before?

     •  Reply
  23. Img 0768
    bigger Nate  4 months ago

    More like they bought it

     •  Reply
  24. Ellis archer profile
    Ellis97  4 months ago

    I couldn’t have said it better myself.

     •  Reply
  25. P1030260
    einarbt  4 months ago

    The US Empire, plutocracy in democratic clothing.

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    VICTOR PROULX  4 months ago

    Take profit out of government.

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    b.john71  4 months ago

    Remember vote early… vote often!!

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    SFpagan  4 months ago

    If not them, then their spouses, friends, relatives, and major campaign donors

     •  Reply
  29. Download
    artegal  4 months ago

    For the love of all that is holy, please wait until GoComics reinstitutes commentary on political cartoons. There has to be some corner of the internet where we can take a break from all the toxicity (and I say that someone who enjoys pushing buttons and basking in the glow of the emotional meltdowns that follow).

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    STKnobb  4 months ago

    definition of “millionaire”?

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    tuliplover  4 months ago

    More like Robbing Hoods. Take from the poor and keep it for themselves. Then they justify it with religion, saying “God helps those who help themselves.” They’re helping themselves, alright. To our money.

     •  Reply
  32. 319312 412581075444989 1358740700 n crop
    waes-hael  4 months ago

    There’re lots of fixes needed to politics in regards to money, but, we are SUPPOSED to be electing the best, a facet which includes most successful, amongst us, so this stat tracks.

    A bigger problem is that in 1787, a Congressperson represented about 50,000 people – that’s a ratio where, if one doesn’t know the candidate, personally, one knows someone who does. NOW that ratio is about about 1:760,000 – that’s anonymity.

     •  Reply
  33. Me  2
    Silence Dogood Premium Member 4 months ago

    Stay out of politics, Pastis, it just generates hate speech. Do something FUNNY! Please.

     •  Reply
  34. Missing large
    billdaviswords  4 months ago

    Sadly true. How is it that most of them are miillionaries (or quickly become millionaires after being elected)?

     •  Reply
  35. Chai
    Perkycat  4 months ago

    Now ask about billionaires………..

     •  Reply
  36. Missing large
    John Jorgensen  4 months ago

    Yup.

     •  Reply
  37. Unnamed3
    minty_Joe  4 months ago

    With great power and privileges comes great responsibility. Just saying…

     •  Reply
  38. Nowyoulisten
    zeexenon  4 months ago

    Bye bye middle class … right on schedule.

     •  Reply
  39. 96480   copy  2
    Goat from PBS  4 months ago

    Time to overthrow the monarchy!

     •  Reply
  40. Rugeirn
    rugeirn  4 months ago

    Last I looked, there was only one senator who WASN’T a millionaire, or multi-millionaire, or more.

     •  Reply
  41. Missing large
    Sprarklin  4 months ago

    I think the real issue is how many people become millionaires AFTER they enter Congress and while they are serving in Congress.

    AOC is one example. Far from the only example, but probably the one name most would recognize.

     •  Reply
  42. Missing large
    wildlandwaters  4 months ago

    recently saw a report on Jackson Hole, WY… if you’re just a millionaire, you’re kind of a peon. People who make hundreds of thousands a year hafta commute from Driggs, Idaho over a pass. The average home in Jackson is over 7 million. I remember going there as a kid almost 60 years ago… sleepy little town then. Fantastic skiing, tho… if you can afford it!

     •  Reply
  43. Large rudolph 178
    Strawberry King  4 months ago

    Dirty, rotten, stinkin’ rich!

     •  Reply
  44. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member 4 months ago

    Please remember to thank the Magat Supreme Court for virtually eliminating all bribes/campaign contributions.

    And now, political payoffs.

    We already know how much the Supremes love bribes.

     •  Reply
  45. Img 20230511 134023590 portrait 5
    markkahler52  4 months ago

    Guess I’ll be the one to ask: Is Rat just now REALIZING this?!

     •  Reply
  46. 1017207 10200214106421862 492754112 n
    Cameron1988 Premium Member 4 months ago

    This is true. This is very true

     •  Reply
  47. Straycat 1
    MFRXIM Premium Member 4 months ago

    I guess this snuck under their censorship radar. Ha ha!

     •  Reply
  48. Fb img 1455926739170
    Treehggr87 Premium Member 4 months ago

    America is a government of the people, by the people and for the people. Everyone in office was elected. Don’t like them? Run for office. Nobody wants to help govern, they just like complaining that everyone is corrupt. You people are exhausting-

     •  Reply
  49. Missing large
    Otis Rufus Driftwood  4 months ago

    As Shakespeare said, the fault lies not in the stars, but ours.

     •  Reply
  50. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  4 months ago

    That’s why they give tax breaks to rich people and make you pay for it.

     •  Reply
  51. Missing large
    glh0001  4 months ago

    Any elected official who spends more to get elected then the job pays should not be paid a salary.

     •  Reply
  52. Missing large
    Rich Douglas  4 months ago

    Not fair. The two populations are extremely different. You would expect a bunch of highly educated, highly talented people to also have and to create wealth.

     •  Reply
  53. Missing large
    jamie  4 months ago

    It’s all about insider trading. Ask Nancy Pelosi, that’s where she and her hubby acquired all their wealth.

     •  Reply
  54. Tink
    snowedin, now known as Missy's mom  4 months ago

    You are exactly right, Mr. Pastis, and they have the ‘right’ to give themselves raises. The inmates are running the asylum.

     •  Reply
  55. Bullwinkle   80x80
    Dacker  Premium Member 4 months ago

    $1M isn’t what it used to be. Anyone over, say, 60-years-old who properly planned for retirement has a net worth over $1M and ideally closer to $2M.

     •  Reply
  56. Missing large
    powerhawk1956  4 months ago

    And thus we would get a real representation. A Congress who understands by experience the needs of a society.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Pearls Before Swine