Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for January 21, 2020

  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  almost 5 years ago

    The good news is that he probably won’t have any children.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    Orcatime  almost 5 years ago

    Ok, Boomer.

     •  Reply
  3. Crazyforkedindianpalmsquirrel max 1mb
    B UTTONS  almost 5 years ago

    Strange, I don’t have feelings in my lower extremities.

     •  Reply
  4. Gocomicsluna2
    Leojim  almost 5 years ago

    Too saggy too baggy too tight to loose oh da’ heck with it all!

     •  Reply
  5. Woobat2
    ChristineFoxdale  almost 5 years ago

    kilt…

     •  Reply
  6. Bluedog
    Bilan  almost 5 years ago

    But definitely better than wearing the pants at half-ass.

     •  Reply
  7. Step 1
    mr_sherman Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    If they’re that tight, he probably doesn’t have to worry about kids.

     •  Reply
  8. Sine1
    frequency270  almost 5 years ago

    It’s just a trend coming back from the 60s-80s!

     •  Reply
  9. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  almost 5 years ago

    I’m totally in favor of tight pants. As long as they’re on tight bodies. The real trick for a pants wearing individual is clearly understanding whether tight will look good or mostly just bulgy.

     •  Reply
  10. Img 3705
    Jesy Bertz Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    Tight pants hug the hipsters.

     •  Reply
  11. Right here
    Sherlock Watson  almost 5 years ago

    Tight pants: They’re not just for fat, clueless women anymore.

     •  Reply
  12. Catsanddogsportrait
    DennisinSeattle  almost 5 years ago

    I admit that I like form-fitting clothing on women. On men, not so much. I don’t know, do women like it? If so, none of my business.

     •  Reply
  13. Blunebottle
    blunebottle  almost 5 years ago

    At least he doesn’t have a man-bun!

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    Differentname  almost 5 years ago

    I’d rather see them too tight than hanging off the butt.

     •  Reply
  15. 3083024 0826053922 daveb
    Kaputnik  almost 5 years ago

    Actually, fashion will probably cycle through the entire possible range of pants tightness, from parachute pants to actual tights, and then cycle back again.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    aKG1  almost 5 years ago

    It’s time to break out the shiny gold hammer pants. Too legit to quit!

     •  Reply
  17. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  almost 5 years ago

    I have never found any enjoyment in mocking a particular generation’s fashion. Who cares? It’s not hurting me one way or the other if you wear skinny jeans or baggy. You can wear a mini-skirt or a gown for all I care, too. Just don’t mess with my kilt.

     •  Reply
  18. 100 3924
    jessie d.  almost 5 years ago

    He is falsely accused, cause it is the female of the human species whose pants are too darn tight and most especially the fat ones.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    asrialfeeple  almost 5 years ago

    If Pig were to hit anyone, would that be a porkchop?

     •  Reply
  20. Picture
    Breadboard  almost 5 years ago

    Well at least he has pants on for Mr.Rat you have no pants on ;-) … Croc Power !

     •  Reply
  21. 2a38e3c1 c33e 44a0 adfe ad023a2caec1
    basspro  almost 5 years ago

    Oh my “Blue Balls” revisited.

     •  Reply
  22. Large mad kid
    FassEddie  almost 5 years ago

    Hey kid! Those tights come wit’ a codpiece?

     •  Reply
  23. Ann margaret
    Caldonia  almost 5 years ago

    It’s the beard that annoys me. The trend of men growing thick beards recently, beards beards beards! I feel like I’m seeing it all the time. You guys have nice enough faces. Cut it out. Did David Letterman start all this? He looks like a savage.

     •  Reply
  24. Img 1561
    Zebrastripes  almost 5 years ago

    People who wear tight genes and or tights NEED to have Long tunic tops to cover the butts, hips and thighs…..OY!

     •  Reply
  25. Animal bird feathers 158087
    jimchronister2016  almost 5 years ago

    This time Rat is correct!

     •  Reply
  26. D9fdd901 051e 4360 bc46 77fca1ec36ed
    Procat Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    I see London, I see France, at least I don’t see underpants!

     •  Reply
  27. De6fdbq 5e0a21ac bc2f 4b76 855c 395d2ca0924d
    NRHAWK Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    In an effort to not follow the crowd and present a different look the hipsters have ended up wearing a uniform. Such is the way of fads.

     •  Reply
  28. Ignatz
    Ignatz Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    Why don’t they bring back bellbottoms?

     •  Reply
  29. Michaelparksjimbronson
    well-i-never  almost 5 years ago

    Everyone seems to be missing the point. They’re Republican pants.

     •  Reply
  30. Triscele
    txmystic  almost 5 years ago

    Had the exact same problem in 1982…

     •  Reply
  31. Millionchimps1
    tripwire45  almost 5 years ago

    Right and wrong side of history. Cute.

     •  Reply
  32. Medium me from sally
    rogerd.parish  almost 5 years ago

    I think the correct reply is not “Thanks, Grandpa” but “OK, boomer!”

     •  Reply
  33. Goofypigavatar
    Pony99CA  almost 5 years ago

    Was the guy a millennial? If so, he should have said “OK Boomer”.

     •  Reply
  34. Ellis archer profile
    Ellis97  almost 5 years ago

    Well there really is no perfect generation or decade. Each and every one had its own fair share of problems.

     •  Reply
  35. Felis silvestrissilvestris europeanwildcat
    BiathlonNut  almost 5 years ago

    Well, on to Calvin and Hobbes …

     •  Reply
  36. Tumble
    Keno21  almost 5 years ago

    There is no reason, ever, for a heterosexual male to wear skinny jeans. Ever.

     •  Reply
  37. Nowyoulisten
    zeexenon  almost 5 years ago

    That hair color suggests a kilt. The boys will thank him for it.

     •  Reply
  38. Missing large
    Dave M  almost 5 years ago

    Unfortunately, mullets are making a comeback too. I think I’d prefer the tight pants.

     •  Reply
  39. Missing large
    theincrediblebulk  almost 5 years ago

    Its better than the wearing of the jeans where the waist is around ones knees. You are forced to watch those idiots to figure out how they can walk without falling on their faces.

     •  Reply
  40. Missing large
    ascha35-gocomics  almost 5 years ago

    Fashion……Prevailing style of dress or behavior at any given time….Like holes in pants……..Like that stupid tie I wore to work for years.

     •  Reply
  41. Mbsils
    marilynnbyerly  almost 5 years ago

    If the “boys” are too compressed and heated, you won’t be able to create one of those new generation kids, young hipster.

     •  Reply
  42. 690904ef 1e7c 4d36 a98a f46b185ca15f
    DCBakerEsq  almost 5 years ago

    And, too short. Ridiculous.

     •  Reply
  43. Missing large
    the lost wizard  almost 5 years ago

    Actually, it’s the pointy shoes that are 4 inches too long for your feet.

     •  Reply
  44. Edison
    gorgolo_chick  almost 5 years ago

    I am very insistent on every article of clothing meeting my personal fashion standards: Actual comfort and do I like it.

     •  Reply
  45. Thinker
    Sisyphos  almost 5 years ago

    I remember stretch jeans (for men) around the early ’70s. Yes, I had a pair. But only one pair, my other jeans were all normal….

     •  Reply
  46. Missing large
    ariel777000  almost 5 years ago

    Well at least that’s better than all black clothing encrusted with chains everywhere. It weighs less. It’s a bit easier to move. It probably is not as hot. And it makes less noise.

     •  Reply
  47. Bill murray drink
    Eric S   almost 5 years ago

    at least they’re above his ass – - STOP COMPLAINING ABOUT GOOD THINGS!

     •  Reply
  48. Missing large
    david_42  almost 5 years ago

    I remember my father commenting on my overly tight slacks back in the 1950s.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Pearls Before Swine