Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for August 15, 2024

  1. Wileecoffee3
    Need coffee  about 1 month ago

    Panel 3 sounds like how the Jetsons and Flintstones were able to exist in the same time period.

     •  Reply
  2. Twin commander 1000 ext
    MeanBob Premium Member about 1 month ago

    You have to draw the line somewhere.

     •  Reply
  3. Trollspry
    Enter.Name.Here  about 1 month ago

    Imagine the wonder… commuter flying cars, backed up for miles like ribbons in the sky….

     •  Reply
  4. Doug3
    baddawg1989  about 1 month ago

    Jeffrey stole that robot rebellion idea from The Terminator and Battlestar Galactica. ;-)

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    cmxx  about 1 month ago

    “. . . . to search for a planet to start over,” which, when found, they will spoil and despoil until they themselves dwindle into oblivion. Again. Sure, they’ll start over with bright, shiny, good, new ideas. But they’ll end up doing the same things we did this first time, producing the same result.

     •  Reply
  6. 1682106 inline inline 2 mel brooks master
    Can't Sleep  about 1 month ago

    Whenever somebody talks about flying cars, I think of them dropping like flies after each fender bender.

     •  Reply
  7. Bluedog
    Bilan  about 1 month ago

    The reason we don’t have flying cars is because too may people are still attached to expensive fossil fuel. If we had low cost energy like fuel cells, that aren’t controlled by a cartel, we would have the extra energy required for cars to fly.

     •  Reply
  8. Camera1 016
    keenanthelibrarian  about 1 month ago

    Thank God I’ll be dead by then, although I wouldn’t mind the adventure. Flying cars? Now that might be a problem …

     •  Reply
  9. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  about 1 month ago

    I saw an article about a flying car that’s in testing right now. 3-minutes to convert, road legal and more expensive than I’m willing to contemplate. They didn’t mention FAA-legal.

     •  Reply
  10. Wolf
    Mediatech  about 1 month ago

    Considering how many drivers are inept at driving in more or less a straight line, I shudder to imagine what it will be like when they can move in three dimensions.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    hfergus Premium Member about 1 month ago

    The way a lot of people drive would make flying cars total chaos. Lots of wrecks, mainly upon takeoff and landing. Given 3 dimensions, f

     •  Reply
  12. Test01b
    LawrenceS  about 1 month ago

    Flying cars would make carjackings less common. Unless some anti-gravity or jet packs are developed to let the thugs get up there.

     •  Reply
  13. Photopictureresizer 190623 022710789 crop 2695x2695 1347x1347
    jvo  about 1 month ago

    The only way flying cars could possibly work is if they were driver-less with passengers just specifying the destination.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    Denver Reader Premium Member about 1 month ago

    Flying cars currently exist! Seriously. Google them.

     •  Reply
  15. Th 9
    Count Olaf Premium Member about 1 month ago

    Robot slaves exist today. They’re called Liberal Democrats and clones are not necessary because we have an Open Border. God Save America.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    oldchas  about 1 month ago

    The people that can afford a flying car already have one along with a pilot to fly it and a limo to take them to the place where they park it.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    rickseg  about 1 month ago

    50 years ago today probably no one thought everyone would have their own personal computers and would actually spend as much or more time using them as watching TV.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    uniquename  about 1 month ago

    The robots don’t have to rebel. They just have to hack the brain plugs.

     •  Reply
  19. Airforce logo3
    hanks132  about 1 month ago

    One thing that should always be kept in mind about flying cars – Gravity Wins!

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    1953Baby  about 1 month ago

    Back to the Future II . . .Stainless Steel Rat. . .Vorbar Sultana. . .been there, done that. . .

     •  Reply
  21. Badger avatar
    Twelve Badgers in a Suit Premium Member about 1 month ago

    The biggest problem with flying cars isn’t technological. We have the technology for flying cars now. The problem is, people are not as observant as we think we are. We have so many ground-car accidents every day that we only report them as traffic hazards. Imagine if all of thoze accidents were moved into the sky, where the pieces could rain down on the populace below. The hospitals and morgues wouldn’t be able to handle it. Stop acting like flying cars are something we should be looking forward to. That’s insane.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    Znox11  about 1 month ago

    The only way flying cars would even be remotely feasible is for there to be some new source of power. And, of course, you would have that subset who would argue against said source of power and make it a political hot potato…So…no flying cars anytime soon.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    david_42  about 1 month ago

    “The Toxic Spell Dump” people have flying carpets and air pollution from the fibers falling off is a major problem.

     •  Reply
  24. Grinch coffee
    I was FRAMED!!!!!!  about 1 month ago

    Based upon how drivers are these day, it would be much, mch worse if they were flying.

     •  Reply
  25. Chaos person gocomics missing
    divad27182  about 1 month ago

    Yesterday, I wrote (about flying cars):

    3) The American driver. Think about it.

    Apparently everybody thought about it. :-)

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    baskate_2000  about 1 month ago

    Flying cars and crazy talk — just like fifty years ago!

     •  Reply
  27. Gocomic avatar
    sandpiper  about 1 month ago

    And who would know crazy talk better than these two?

     •  Reply
  28. Balloon32
    freewaydog  about 1 month ago

    Flying cars WILL be a thing soon!

     •  Reply
  29. Greg backlit
    mindjob  about 1 month ago

    I think it will be human slaves who rise up against the robots and will lose because life isn’t like the movies

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    ManiacEx  about 1 month ago

    Most people can barely manage to drive on the ground, so I’m with Jeffrey on this one. The idea of flying cars for the public was never anything but crazy talk.

     •  Reply
  31. Frank
    Frankfreak  about 1 month ago

    Teleportation: killing the organism by distroying it, transmitting the data and reconstructing a copy at the receiving/arrival area.

     •  Reply
  32. Me 3 23 2020
    ChukLitl Premium Member about 1 month ago

    People want bots & clones because they still want slaves. Slaves are always revolting, for good reason.

     •  Reply
  33. Missing large
    ng3  about 1 month ago

    I clearly remember a Sunday comic strip that discussed possible future tech marvels. The two tht come to mind are flying cars and self driving cars.

     •  Reply
  34. Missing large
    AndromedaMike  about 1 month ago

    I don’t want to replace reading. Sometimes I listen to the words I’m saying, their patterns and rhythms. Reading the words, the phrases, and the thoughts of others can be music for my brain.

     •  Reply
  35. Citizens for a canadian republic
    A Hip loving Canadian...  about 1 month ago

    Imagine cars that drive and crash without human input, no need to wait 50 years for them either.

     •  Reply
  36. Missing large
    Darth Nefarius  about 1 month ago

    Where is my flying car!?!?!?!?!?!

     •  Reply
  37. 23 asterix with sword
    up2trixx  about 1 month ago

    Flying cars would be awesome. Crashing cars not so much.

     •  Reply
  38. Missing large
    wildlandwaters  about 1 month ago

    not unlike autonomous vehicles. Awhile back a lady was walking her bicycle across the street. The car was programmed to stop for a bicycle, or a pedestrian, but not a pedestrian walking with a bicycle, so it hits her. Gee, who woulda thunk that a self driving car could be a problem? But, to be fair, most cars with someone behind the wheel don’t do much better…

     •  Reply
  39. Hat large square
    Cactus-Pete  about 1 month ago

    It appears that he doesn’t understand cloning, and teleportation. And flying cars already exist – they’re called helicopters.

     •  Reply
  40. Kirby close up with poppies behind   close cropped
    mistercatworks  about 1 month ago

    People cannot park as it is. Imagine millions of these clowns trying to corner in a vehicle with no traction.

     •  Reply
  41. 136061 pic
    Mike Baldwin creator about 1 month ago

    My Jetpack is still on back order.

     •  Reply
  42. Darth01
    ObsiWan Premium Member about 1 month ago

    I’d rather have high-speed rail (city-to-city) and self-driving commuter service (to and from work/shopping) than flying cars. No more getting ripped off by insurance companies

     •  Reply
  43. Missing large
    lnrokr55  about 1 month ago

    What makes anyone think that the only version of the future is determined by Television and Popular culture. Guess the old newspapers had it right when they dumbed themselves down to a 3rd grade reading level! ;-) Come on Weekend !

     •  Reply
  44. Durak ukraine
    Durak Premium Member about 1 month ago

    Future? Everything Jeremy said is in the past, it our history, it’s how we got here!

     •  Reply
  45. Win 20201204 12 32 23 pro
    oakie817  about 1 month ago

    think of the accidents

     •  Reply
  46. Th 2434264126
    Snoots  about 1 month ago

    Imagine car engines failing and falling out of the sky… or crashing at 250 mph…

     •  Reply
  47. 2008happynewyear1024
    TexTech  about 1 month ago

    I think Jeffery just ripped off a line from Cosmo Cramer.

     •  Reply
  48. Me in florida  2009
    will.pittenger1  about 1 month ago

    He has a time machine and could find out.

     •  Reply
  49. Missing large
    [Unnamed Reader - 14b4ce]  about 1 month ago

    They had flying cars,but Mr.Spacely cheated George Jetson on t he patent rights

     •  Reply
  50. Twblob
    SrTechWriter  about 1 month ago

    Aligned with the name of this strip, here is a Non-Sequitur observation:

    The blog Raw Story runs a periodic political poll. The current results of the most recent one (as posted on 17 Aug 24) were:

    “Should Vice President Kamala Harris be our next president?”

    Yes – 21480 votes

    No – (2333) votes

    Of 23,813 total responses, that’s 9.8% against, and 90.2% for, Harris.

    Granted, that doesn’t account for undecided or media bias. Still, even if 30% of those who might have voted in this poll, did not because they were ‘undecided’, and all those voted ‘No’, Harris still would win the election by more than 10% of the vote.

    It’s not a definitive measure, and I’m not trying to make it such. I do find it interesting that, of those who felt strongly enough to take time to vote in this obscure little poll, such a huge majority voted that she should be the next President.

    If anything close to this gap presents itself during the election in November 24, Kamala Harris will be elected in one of the biggest landslide popular vote victories in the history of the US. It would far surpass James Monroe’s 64.69%, and and be beaten only by George Washington’s two 100% (unopposed) election victories.

    Harris also is pulling ahead in national poll after poll with ratings of 50+ to 56+%, including in so-called ‘battleground’ states. Trump, who has fallen in poll after poll well below 50%, and in some polls below 40%, is failing. Attendance at her public appearances is larger than Trump’s and growing, while his are shrinking.

    And he can not figure out why a white, sexist, pseudo-Christian, lying, racist, misogynistic, felonious, treasonous, multimillionaire megalomaniac is losing to a Black female. He shouldn’t be. In fact, he can’t be. It isn’t possible. Just ask him.

    The answer, of course, is that the polls are fake. Everything that is positive about Kamala MUST be a fake, drummed up by the never-to-be-sufficiently-darned Deep State. /S

     •  Reply
  51. Bcdd518e 925a 4ed0 b700 64375c2235d0
    jfthomas70  30 days ago

    I do not want people who can not drive in 2D to crash into me in 3D.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur